HTML5 standardisation and Facebook

I recently stumbled across an article on ITworld: Facebook pushes for HTML5 standardization, mobile payments. It did a good job of hanging some thoughts off the back of an attention-grabbing headline but, IMHO, missed the point.

Let’s get this straight: standardisation is a wholly good thing. It gives us all confidence that the sites and apps we build will be accessible by the widest number of users. Likewise, the extension of this standardisation into the area of mobile payments will mean that people will be able to shop on their mobiles and be sure that it’s safe, secure and effective to do so. All good stuff.

What the article neglects to mention is that the W3C Mobile Web Platform Community Group currently has 83 participants including people from Nokia, Zynga, Opera, Intel and Facebook (among many others). And it has a much wider remit than simply mobile payments – check out the group’s charter here.

It’s in the charter you’ll find the really important part of the group’s work – it will deliver specifications, guidance and, crucially, test suites.

It’s these test suites (such as Facebook’s own Ringmark) that will make or break any resulting standardisation. The more people who can supply robust, effective testing the better. (And just to blow our own trumpet for a moment, when it comes to HTML5 and related specifications Microsoft has added over 7548 tests.)

In the final analysis, the development of the mobile web will be less about specifications and more about implementation. The work done by the W3C and its community groups is a vital step forward. But it’s within the test suites that these initiatives will be won or lost.

Published by thebeebs

Martin works for Oracle as a Developer Evangelist. He’s been a developer since the late 90s and loves figuring out problems and experimenting with code. Read more